4M Analysis | Fishbone Diagram

4M Analysis

The 4M analysis is a problem-solving method used to identify the root cause of a problem or defect in a process. It is based on the premise that most problems can be traced back to one or more of the following four elements:

1. Man: This refers to the human factors involved in the process, such as operators, supervisors, or other personnel.
2. Machine: This refers to the equipment or machinery used in the process.
3. Material: This refers to the raw materials, components, or products involved in the process.
4. Method: This refers to the procedures, processes, or systems used to produce the product or provide the service.

By analyzing each of these elements, it becomes easier to identify the root cause of a problem and develop appropriate corrective actions. The 4M analysis can be used in a variety of settings, including manufacturing, service industries, and healthcare.

How to do a 4M analysis

To conduct a 4M analysis, follow these steps:

Define the problem

Clearly define and describe the problem or defect that is being experienced. This may involve collecting data and conducting observations to gather information about the issue.

Defining the problem is the first step in conducting a 4M analysis. In this step, the goal is to clearly define and describe the problem or defect that is being experienced. This is critical to ensuring that the correct problem is being addressed, as identifying the wrong problem can lead to ineffective solutions.

To define the problem, the following steps can be taken:

• Gather data: Collect data and information about the problem, such as when it occurs, how often it occurs, and what the consequences are. This may involve conducting observations, collecting process data, or gathering information from relevant stakeholders.
• Describe the problem: Clearly describe the problem, including its symptoms, causes, and effects. Be as specific as possible and provide enough detail to ensure that the problem can be understood by all relevant stakeholders.
• Verify the problem: Verify that the problem described is indeed the actual problem that is being experienced. This may involve reviewing data and information, conducting additional observations, or confirming with relevant stakeholders.

Defining the problem in a clear and accurate manner is essential to ensure that the 4M analysis is focused on addressing the correct issue and that effective corrective actions can be developed.

Identify the 4Ms

Analyze each of the four elements of the 4Ms (Man, Machine, Material, Method) to determine if they may be contributing to the problem.

The next step in conducting a 4M analysis is to identify the 4Ms, which are the four elements that can contribute to a problem or defect. The 4Ms are:

• Man: Refers to the human element, such as operators, supervisors, and managers. This includes factors such as training, experience, and personal habits that can impact the quality of the process.
• Machine: Refers to the equipment, tools, or systems used in the process. This includes factors such as maintenance, design, and capabilities of the equipment.
• Material: Refers to the raw materials, components, or parts used in the process. This includes factors such as quality, composition, and handling of the materials.
• Method: Refers to the procedures, processes, or systems used to produce the product or provide the service. This includes factors such as the design of the process, the steps involved, and the systems and tools used to carry out the process.

The goal of identifying the 4Ms is to determine if any of these elements may be contributing to the problem or defect being experienced. This involves analyzing each of the 4Ms to determine if there are any flaws or inefficiencies that could be causing the problem.

The information gathered during this step can be used to develop a Fishbone diagram, which can visually organize and analyze the potential causes of the problem. This can help to identify the root cause of the problem and develop effective corrective actions.

Useful Links:

• Productivity Tools
• Quality Tools
• Process optimization Tools
• Lean Manufacturing Tools
• How to Apply for MNC Jobs

Develop a Fishbone diagram

Use a Fishbone diagram (also known as an Ishikawa diagram or cause-and-effect diagram) to visually organize and analyze the potential causes of the problem.

A Fishbone diagram, also known as an Ishikawa diagram or cause-and-effect diagram, is a visual tool used to organize and analyze the potential causes of a problem or defect. The diagram takes the shape of a fish skeleton, with the problem being the head of the fish and the causes being represented as bones branching off from the spine.

To develop a Fishbone diagram, follow these steps:

• Identify the problem: Start by clearly defining the problem or defect being experienced. Write the problem statement at the head of the diagram.
• Identify the 4Ms: Identify the four elements of the 4Ms (Man, Machine, Material, Method) that may be contributing to the problem. Write each of the 4Ms on separate branches extending from the spine of the diagram.
• Identify potential causes: Identify the potential causes of the problem under each of the 4Ms. Write each potential cause on a separate branch extending from the corresponding 4M branch.
• Add supporting information: Add supporting information, such as data, observations, and analysis, to each of the potential causes. This can help to further clarify the relationships between the causes and the problem.
• Evaluate and prioritize the causes: Evaluate the information gathered and prioritize the potential causes to determine which are most likely to be contributing to the problem. Focus on the most significant causes and develop corrective actions to address them.

A Fishbone diagram is a useful tool for organizing and analyzing the potential causes of a problem. It can help to identify the root cause of the problem and develop effective corrective actions to address the issue. The diagram can also be used to communicate the problem and its causes to relevant stakeholders, and to ensure that everyone has a common understanding of the issue and how it will be addressed.

Identify the root cause

Evaluate the information gathered during the 4M analysis and Fishbone diagram to identify the root cause of the problem. This may involve conducting further investigations and data analysis to gather more information.

Identifying the root cause of a problem is a crucial step in conducting a 4M analysis. The root cause is the underlying reason for the problem or defect, and addressing it is essential to ensure that the problem is effectively resolved.

To identify the root cause, the following steps can be taken:

• Review the Fishbone diagram: Review the Fishbone diagram developed in the previous step to identify the potential causes of the problem.
• Evaluate the causes: Evaluate each of the potential causes to determine which are most likely to be contributing to the problem. Consider factors such as frequency, impact, and the likelihood of occurrence to prioritize the causes.
• Confirm the root cause: Confirm the root cause by testing the most likely causes to determine which is the underlying reason for the problem. This may involve conducting experiments, simulations, or other types of testing to verify the root cause.
• Validate the root cause: Validate the root cause by collecting additional data and information to support the conclusion. This may involve gathering data from other sources, such as process data, customer feedback, or industry standards.

Identifying the root cause of a problem is essential to ensure that effective corrective actions can be developed. Addressing the root cause will prevent the problem from recurring and will ensure that the process is operating effectively and efficiently.

Develop and implement corrective actions

Based on the root cause identified, develop and implement corrective actions to address the problem and prevent it from happening again in the future.

Once the root cause of a problem has been identified, the next step is to develop and implement corrective actions to address the issue. The goal of the corrective actions is to resolve the problem and prevent it from occurring again in the future.

To develop and implement corrective actions, follow these steps:

• Develop a plan: Develop a plan for addressing the root cause of the problem. Consider factors such as feasibility, cost, and resources required to implement the corrective actions.
• Involve relevant stakeholders: Involve relevant stakeholders, such as operators, supervisors, and managers, in the development and implementation of the corrective actions. This can help to ensure that everyone is aware of the issue and how it will be addressed.
• Implement the corrective actions: Implement the corrective actions as planned. This may involve making changes to the process, equipment, or materials used, or providing additional training to operators.
• Monitor the results: Monitor the results of the corrective actions to determine if the problem has been effectively resolved. Collect data and information to support the conclusion.
• Continuous improvement: Continuously monitor the process and the results of the corrective actions to identify areas for improvement. Implement additional corrective actions as needed to ensure that the process is operating effectively and efficiently.

Developing and implementing corrective actions is essential to ensure that the problem is effectively resolved and that the process is operating effectively and efficiently. Regular monitoring and continuous improvement can help to ensure that the process is constantly improving and that problems are prevented from occurring in the future.

Verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions

Monitor the process and gather data to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions and ensure that the problem has been fully resolved.

Verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions is an important step in ensuring that the problem has been effectively resolved and that the process is operating effectively and efficiently.

To verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions, the following steps can be taken:

• Monitor the process: Monitor the process to determine if the corrective actions have effectively resolved the problem. Collect data and information to support the conclusion.
• Compare before and after data: Compare data from before and after the implementation of the corrective actions to determine if the process has improved. Look for changes in key metrics, such as quality, efficiency, and cost, to determine if the corrective actions have been effective.
• Conduct follow-up inspections: Conduct follow-up inspections to determine if the problem has been effectively resolved and that the process is operating effectively and efficiently.
• Gather feedback from relevant stakeholders: Gather feedback from relevant stakeholders, such as operators, supervisors, and managers, to determine if they have noticed any improvement in the process.
• Review the results: Review the results of the monitoring and follow-up activities to determine if the corrective actions have been effective. If the corrective actions have not been effective, re-evaluate the root cause and develop new corrective actions as needed.

Verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions is essential to ensure that the problem has been effectively resolved and that the process is operating effectively and efficiently. Regular monitoring and follow-up can help to ensure that the process is constantly improving and that problems are prevented from occurring in the future.

Read More:-

• 3G Gemba, Gembutsu, Genjitsu
• 3K 3M 3R 4M
• 4M Analysis
• Avoid These Common Mistakes in a Job Interview
• Continual Improvement Process
• Difference Between Cycle Time And Lead Time
• Importance of daily work management
• KAIZEN

FAQ-